2 Плагины обсидиана для редактирования страниц
Plugin Name | Total Rating | Website | WYSIWYG Editing (10%) | Text Formatting (10%) | Text Color & Background (5%) | Alignment & Indentation (5%) | Lists (5%) | Tables (10%) | Images (5%) | Links (5%) | Headings (5%) | Spell Check (10%) | Grammar Check (10%) | Auto Formatting (5%) | Focus Mode (5%) | Custom Commands (5%) | User Experience (5%) |
Editing Toolbar | 8.0 | GitHub | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
Markdown Formatting Assistant | 7.5 | GitHub | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Table Editor | 5.0 | GitHub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Linter | 4.8 | GitHub | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 7 |
LanguageTool | 3.2 | GitHub | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Detailed Analysis
Introduction
Obsidian is a versatile Markdown-based note-taking application that can be customized with plugins to emulate Microsoft Word’s editing environment. Users accustomed to Word may seek features like visual (WYSIWYG) editing, rich text formatting, table management, spell and grammar checking, and focus modes for distraction-free writing. This analysis compares six Obsidian plugins—Editing Toolbar, Markdown Formatting Assistant, Table Editor, LanguageTool, Linter, and Zoom—evaluating their ability to replicate Word’s functionality. Each plugin is assessed across 15 parameters, weighted to reflect their importance in creating a Word-like editing experience.
Methodology
The comparison is based on plugin descriptions from their GitHub repositories and community feedback. We selected plugins that enhance Markdown editing with Word-like features, focusing on visual interfaces, formatting, tables, and text correction. The 15 parameters were chosen to cover core Word functionalities, with weights assigned to prioritize critical features like WYSIWYG editing and spell checking (10% each) over secondary features like focus mode (5%). Scores (0–10) reflect the extent to which each plugin supports a parameter, with 10 indicating full support and 0 indicating none. The total rating is calculated as the sum of (score × weight), where weights are percentages converted to decimals (e.g., 10% = 0.1), yielding a score from 0 to 10.
Parameter Definitions
Below are the parameters used in the comparison, along with their weights and criteria for scoring:
- WYSIWYG Editing (10%): Provides a visual editing interface where formatting is applied in real-time, like Word’s editor. Score of 10 for full WYSIWYG support; 0 for none.
- Text Formatting (10%): Supports bold, italic, underline, and strikethrough. Score of 10 for comprehensive formatting; 0 for none.
- Text Color & Background (5%): Allows changing text and background colors. Score of 10 for full color support; 0 for none.
- Alignment & Indentation (5%): Supports text alignment (left, right, center, justify) and indentation. Score of 10 for full support; 0 for none.
- Lists (5%): Supports bulleted and numbered lists. Score of 10 for full list support; 0 for none.
- Tables (10%): Enables table creation, editing, and formatting. Score of 10 for advanced table editing; 0 for none.
- Images (5%): Supports image insertion and editing. Score of 10 for full image support; 0 for none.
- Links (5%): Supports hyperlinks and internal links. Score of 10 for full link support; 0 for none.
- Headings (5%): Supports heading levels (H1–H6). Score of 10 for full heading support; 0 for none.
- Spell Check (10%): Provides real-time spell checking. Score of 10 for comprehensive spell checking; 0 for none.
- Grammar Check (10%): Provides real-time grammar checking. Score of 10 for comprehensive grammar checking; 0 for none.
- Auto Formatting (5%): Automatically applies formatting rules for consistency. Score of 10 for full automation; 0 for none.
- Focus Mode (5%): Offers distraction-free editing or focus on specific document parts. Score of 10 for advanced focus features; 0 for none.
- Custom Commands (5%): Allows custom commands or shortcuts. Score of 10 for extensive customization; 0 for none.
- User Experience (5%): Reflects ease of use and intuitiveness. Score of 10 for highly intuitive; 0 for poor usability.